Research and statistics references resource |
The research needs of primary care Paul Thomas BMJ 2000;321 2-3
Randomised controlled trials in primary care: case study Sue Wilson, Brendan C Delaney, Andrea Roalfe, Lesley Roberts, Val Redman, Andy M Wearn, and F D Richard Hobbs BMJ 2000;321 24-27
Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? Stuart Barton BMJ 2000;321 255-256
Networks for research in primary health care Paul Thomas, Frances Griffiths, Joe Kai, and Aislinn O'Dwyer BMJ 2001;322 588-590
Better standards for better reporting of RCTs Patrick M M Bossuyt BMJ 2001;322 1317-1318
Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests Jonathan J Deeks BMJ 2001;323 157-162
Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study S M Campbell, M Hann, J Hacker, C Burns, D Oliver, A Thapar, N Mead, D Gelb Safran, and M O Roland BMJ 2001;323 784
Qualitative research in systematic reviews Mary Dixon-Woods and Ray Fitzpatrick BMJ 2001;323 765-766
Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study A C Freeman and K Sweeney BMJ 2001;323 1100
Statistics Notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements Andrew J Vickers and Douglas G Altman BMJ 2001;323 1123-1124
Evidence based paediatrics: Evidence based management of nocturnal enuresis Jonathan H C Evans BMJ 2001;323 1167-1169
Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy are transferable Les Irwig, Patrick Bossuyt, Paul Glasziou, Constantine Gatsonis, and Jeroen Lijmer BMJ 2002;324 669-671
Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice R Brian Haynes, P J Devereaux, and Gordon H Guyatt BMJ 2002;324 1350
Organising a research project from scratch Melanie Feldman and Kate Casey
Statistics Notes: Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates Douglas G Altman and J Martin Bland BMJ 2003;326 219